SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT ON THE NAMIBIAN CLAIMS - WAS MISS ASINO REALLY A VICTIM OR A PAWN...?

The Maerua Mall Office Towers linked to Maerua Mall are considered a prestigious business address in Windhoek, are high-end corporate offices in a prime location, often used by established businesses and professionals in Namibia. This office towers offers modern facilities, high-speed connectivity, meeting rooms, and 24-hour access, making it ideal for professional operations.

The offices at Maerua Mall in Windhoek are where RRA Namibia was based, directly contradicting claims made in a report by The Namibian. The publication alleged that Mr. Mogapi operated from an apartment and portrayed him as a fly-by-night operator, while also accusing him of defrauding a Namibian woman of N$1.7 million. These assertions are challenged by the documented business presence at a recognised commercial office location. The matter raises serious concerns about the accuracy and fairness of the reporting in question.

Asino VS Mogapi - The other side of the story that you might not have heard before...

This page is published in the interests of full transparency and to set the factual record straight about public allegations that have circulated in the media and on social platforms concerning Mr. Nixau Kealeboga Gift Mogapi and businesses associated with him. Mr. Mogapi denies any unlawful or improper conduct and invites independent verification of the public record.

SUMMARY POSITION 

- If there were any truth to allegations that I have criminal liability as purportedly reported by The Namibian, I would have been contacted by the relevant authorities in Namibia, South Africa or through Interpol. None of these institutions; the Namibian Police, Namibian Courts, Interpol or the South African Police Service (SAPS) — have any record that I was charged, arrested, prosecuted or convicted in relation to the matters reported by The Namibian. I personally contacted all these institutions with a view to avail myself and answer any questions and or charges if any.

— I did not concealed or erased adverse information about myself. I decline to live a fabricated “clean” profile: the public should see and assess my real life, including the hardships I have endured. I ask that people form opinions on documented facts, not on one-sided media narratives or social media speculation.

WHAT REALLY HAPPENED (concise factual chronology)

- A review of Namibian governance records will confirm that I conducted lawful business development activities in Namibia after identifying opportunities in financial services, insurance, funeral services and SME support. I established and operated through properly incorporated entities, leased premises in a recognized Windhoek office tower managed by an international property company, and rented apartments within the Maerua Mall complex. These facts contradict and refute The Namibian’s assertion that I ran my operations “from a flat near Maerua Mall.” The record demonstrates that my offices were reputable, accessed only through Maerua Mall, and that I acted in full compliance with local laws and regulatory requirements. This misrepresentation is one of several falsehoods propagated in the deliberate malicious article by The Namibian.

- I recruited and worked with a Namibian and regional team, including members originally from South Africa, Zimbabwe, and Malawi who were resident in Namibia. We operated with transparency, sought all necessary regulatory approvals—including applications for financial services and insurance licences—and offered lawful venture partnership structures to prospective local partners.

- While conducting pre-establishment due diligence in Namibia, an associate, related to Miss Justina Wiliko Asino, asked that I consider her cousin for employment. Miss Asino subsequently joined our Windhoek office after being offered a position. Having engaged with the business and its objectives, she then expressed interest in acquiring shares in one of our companies; following the agreed procedures, she and others became shareholders in accordance with our governance and transparency standards. The Namibian never bothered to interview other shareholders who bought shares the same way that Miss Asino did and this raises the question, why did The Namibian exclude other shareholders and only wrote a one sided article only in the best interest of Miss Asino…???

- Prior to our scheduled team trip to Walvis Bay and Swakopmund, Miss Asino exhibited concerning behavior. Phone records for the group—including mine and hers—show she was absent before departure and repeatedly urged us not to leave her behind. We acceded to her requests and delayed our departure to wait for her, ultimately travelling late at night and suffering an accident on approach to Swakopmund. Telephone logs and transcripts, CCTV footage and eyewitness statements corroborate this sequence of events.

- Following a business trip to the coast, Miss Asino disappeared from contact. Once again, telephone records will prove how much we did our level best to get hold of Miss Asino and later noticed that she had blocked most if not all of us as her colleagues. Whilst we were battling to get hold of Miss Asino, The Namibian published an article alleging wrongdoing connected with Miss Asino and a N$1.7m loss. I maintain as supported by factual evidence that the published account by The Namibian is factually incomplete, misleading and malicious. 

- Telephone records and transcripts will show that, hours before The Namibian published its article, I received a call from a woman identifying herself as Miss Sonja Smith, a journalist for The Namibian, who said she was preparing a story concerning Miss Justina Wiliko Asino and sought my account. I gave a full, transparent response, as the transcripts demonstrate. The Namibian chose not to publish my side, electing instead to run a one‑sided narrative that cast me as the antagonist and Miss Asino as a victim. I categorically reject that characterization. Available evidence — which I intend to present in due course through appropriate legal channels — will demonstrate that Miss Asino was not the passive victim portrayed in the article. My commitment to openness remains absolute: I have provided my account, and I will rely on verifiable records and due process to establish the facts.

- Other mainstream Namibian media outlets including two radio stations that sought my comment and I suspect that after conducting a proper due diligence, such media outlets most probably decided not to publish a skewed story as published by The Namibian. I suspect that if other publications had found merit to publish this story, they too would have done so and the fact that they did not do so, I believe that that disproved the claims published by The Namibian in their one sided malicious article in favour of Miss Wiliko Asino.

MATERIAL FACTS THAT THE NAMIBIAN DID NOT ADDRESS OR VERIFY 

- NO POLICE RECORD: My cellphone records will show the fact immediately after this malicious article by The Namibian, I personally contacted the Namibian Police and the Namibian Courts, that because I was already in South Africa, I also sent my team members who will also testify to the fact that they went to enquire as to whether there was any such matter on record at the Namibian Police and or at the Namibian Courts and neither had any record corroborating an open criminal case against me.

NO INTERPOL OR SAPS ACTION

- Given bilateral and multilateral law-enforcement cooperation between South Africa and Namibia, no requests or arrest notices were ever issued to me by the Namibian Police, or Interpol or the SAPS.- I personally presented myself to the South African Police Service (SAPS) as I enquired about this matter and the SAPS assured me that there was no record of any case or a request by the Namibian Police for my arrest on their record.

- The Namibian failed to provide evidence to corroborate their claims as per their malicious article.

ONE SIDED SOURCING

- The Namibian’s article singularly elevated Miss Asino’s version while failing to interview or publish accounts from other shareholders, staff, clients or available documentary evidence that contradicts their narrative.

SELECTIVE COVERAGE

- Other legitimate shareholders and investors were and are still involved. The Namibian should explain why its coverage singled out a single individual when multiple parties participated. Why was Miss Asino’s account elevated above others to the extent that it overshadowed the broader context and the interests of other stakeholders? Such selective emphasis demands justification.

BUSINESS PREMISES AND OPERATIONS

- The Namibian’s account mischaracterised my operations, alleging I worked from “a flat near Maerua Mall” and implying a transient, fly‑by‑night presence. This is false and malicious. Documentary evidence — including a valid lease agreement, CCTV footage, visitor logs, and witness testimony — establishes that I operated from a reputable, well‑known office tower in suburban Windhoek at the Maerua Mall, one of the well recognised, respected and most sort after business address in Windhoek, Namibia. These verifiable facts directly contradict the newspaper’s inaccurate portrayal as captured in their malicious article.

EVIDENCE AND VERIFICATION 

- I invite independent journalists, regulators and investigators to review the following :

- Namibian Police and Namibian court records (to confirm charges and or convictions in this regard);

- Interpol and SAPS records (to confirm any notices and or action);

- Company incorporation documents, shareholder registers and share-transfer records for the Namibian entities;

- Lease agreements, office building management records, CCTV and visitor logs for my Windhoek, Namibian offices;

- Cellphone call/SMS records and other contemporaneous communications for parties involved;

- Bank and investment records that demonstrate funds flow and the existence of other investors and shareholders.

- I encourage anyone with corroborating evidence supporting either position and is willing to give evidence under oath to present it to journalists, regulators and law enforcement in either or both Namibia and South Africa so the public record can be corrected accordingly.

RESPONSE, REDRESS and NEXT STEPS

- I categorically deny the allegation of criminal conduct as set out in the article published by The Namibian.

- I accept that I erred in following advice not to pursue legal remedies earlier right at the beginning of this saga.

- I now intend to seek redress through lawful means, including civil and defamation proceedings where appropriate against: the journalists and individuals who published knowingly false statements in this regard, The Namibian where it published materially false, or misleading and or malicious content, and any person who knowingly used such false reporting to discredit me.

ASSISTANCE TO VICTIMS 

- Any proceeds recovered through lawful remedies will be applied, in part, to support victims of similar reputational or financial harm and to advance philanthropic projects consistent with the mission of N!xau Holdings.

PERSONAL COMMITMENT

- I remain committed to lawful conduct, to supporting SMEs and communities across Africa, and to full cooperation with any lawful investigation.- No amount of malicious reporting will deter me from ensuring that I use my authentic gifts to secure a process of Reclaiming, Restoring and Sustaining Our Identity ans Self-worth.

CLOSING APPEAL

- Do not treat unverified posts or one-sided articles as conclusive proof. Seek verifiable records from  police cases, court records and authenticated corporate documents.

- If you possess information that clarifies these matters, or in a case where you wish to engage me further on this, Please feel free to contact me directly via this Email: legal@agtgc.com

I trust that clears the air regarding this malicious article by The Namibian

Penned by,

Nixau Kealeboga Gift Mogapi

Founder and Executive Chairman,

RRA Namibia (A subsidiary of RRA South Africa)

(Philanthropic Entrepreneur — Committed to Transparency and Accountability)

Last updated: Tuesday 17, March 2026